Experts Agree that UK Will Avoid Housing Market Crash

A panel of experts are in agreement that house prices will continue to fall by as much as 10% between now and Autumn 2024, according to new research conducted by personal finance comparison website, finder.com.

Finder brought together an expert panel of academics, economists, mortgage and savings experts, to ask them for their predictions on what will happen to the base rate for the rest of 2023, and the impact this will have on the UK economy.

Almost three quarters of the experts (73%) believe that house prices will fall between 5% – 10%, with more than half expecting prices to fall between 5% – 7.5%, and 18% predicting a more substantial drop of 7.5% – 10%.

Charles Read, fellow in economics at the University of Cambridge expects house prices to drop by 5% – 7.5%.

He explained that: “sharp rises in interest rates since the end of 2021 has reduced affordability of mortgages and new house purchases, pushing down prices”.

David Mcmillan, professor in finance at the University of Stirling expects a more severe reduction of 7.5% – 10%.

McMillan explained that household incomes will be “squeezed in several ways” next year and “as much as these economic conditions will lead to price falls, they will also likely lead to a fall in the volume of transactions.”

David Hollingworth, associate director at L&C Mortgages agrees that house prices will fall but not significantly, as he expects buyer confidence could grow.

He commented that: “as the rate outlook improves and mortgage rates stabilise and continue to improve, that could see buyer confidence begin to improve into next year which will likely see a soft landing.”

Source: Property Notify

Buyers Still have an Appetite to Transact, Even in Tough Market Conditions

October saw a 0.9% rise in UK house prices, after taking account of seasonal effects.

This resulted in an improvement in the annual rate of house price growth to -3.3%, from -5.3% in September.

Nevertheless, housing market activity has remained extremely weak, with just 43,300 mortgages approved for house purchase in September, around 30% below the monthly average prevailing in 2019.

This is not surprising as affordability remains stretched, comments Robert Gardner, Nationwide’s Chief Economist.

Gardner continued, market interest rates, which underpin mortgage pricing, have moderated somewhat but they are still well above the lows prevailing in 2021.

The uptick in house prices in October most likely reflects the fact that the supply of properties on the market is constrained.

There is little sign of forced selling, which would exert downward pressure on prices, as labour market conditions are solid and mortgage arrears are at historically low levels.

Activity and house prices are likely to remain subdued in the coming quarters.

Despite signs that cost-of-living pressures are easing, with the rate of inflation now running below the rate of average earnings growth, consumer confidence remains weak and surveyors continue to report subdued levels of new buyer enquiries.

With Bank Rate not expected to decline significantly in the years ahead, borrowing costs are unlikely to return to the historic lows seen in the aftermath of the pandemic.

Instead, it appears likely that a combination of solid income growth, together with modestly lower house prices and mortgage rates, will gradually improve affordability over time, with housing market activity remaining fairly subdued in the interim, Gardner concluded.

Source: Property Notify

The Politicians Are Talking About Housing… And That’s No Bad Thing

It is hard to get away from politics these days, in any part of the world. And, while the tragedies playing out in the Middle East are heartbreaking and have dominated the news agenda, what is happening closer to home is not without interest. For the housing market, it could be rather important.

Sir Keir Starmer, the Labour leader, set the ball rolling with his speech at his party conference in Liverpool, in which he pledged 1.5 million new homes over five years, saying that he would “bulldoze” through restrictive planning rules and local opposition, if necessary, to achieve it.

There is not, as I have written before, much chance of 1.5 million new homes being built over five years, something that was last achieved in the 1960s, barring a supercharged council housebuilding programme.

When the 300,000 average was last achieved, local authorities accounted for 40 per cent of new homes built.

Given the state of the public finances, while many might argue for a re-run of that policy, that is unlikely to happen either.

The best hope lies with insurance companies and pension funds, who could see rented properties as the kind of stable long-term investment they need.

So far, however, only a small number have dipped their toes in the water.

Even so, there were suggestions that Starmer’s bold words would backfire.

Would “Nimby” voters in the shires react against a Labour party promising to bulldoze through restrictions?

Conservative party members canvassing in Mid Bedfordshire, if not Tamworth, reported some disquiet on the doorsteps.

Mid-Beds, it seemed, could remain a Tory seat, though with a sharply reduced majority, because of this factor.

As you will know, if there was such disquiet, it was not enough to prevent Labour achieving stunning victories in these “safe” Conservative seats.

Voters know that, while they may not like the noises Labour has been making about building on the edges of the green belt – which official figures show has been expanding, not shrinking – their children will need somewhere to live and a chronic shortage of housing, to buy or to rent, does nobody any good.

After a surprise victory in the Uxbridge by-election a few weeks ago, attributed by many to a protest against the extension of the London mayor’s ULEZ scheme, the prime minister decided to go more slowly on net zero measures.

Had the Tories held on in Mid Beds, the government might have decided that all was well with its housing policy and that there was no need to be more adventurous.

Fortunately, that was not the case.

Labour’s victory has renewed talk, which many in the industry have been talking about, of a “retail offer” to voters either later this year or in the November 22 autumn statement, or next year in the March budget.

There are, according to The Times, two candidates for this retail offer.

One is stamp duty, though it is not obvious on the face of it what that offer might be.

The temporary increases in stamp duty announced in November last year are still in place and will be until April 2025.

These, to remind you, were a zero rate up to £250,000 (though not for landlords) and an increase in the nil rate threshold for first-time buyers’ relief from £300,000 to £425,000.

That meant total relief in this category of a maximum of £625,000.

The other candidate for this retail offer is of less direct interest to the housing market, though of indirect interest.

This is said to be an increase in the inheritance tax threshold, or even a more dramatic move on the tax.

This would be a U-turn.

In his autumn statement in November last year Jeremy Hunt extended the freeze on the £325,000 inheritance tax threshold until April 2028.

Rishi Sunak, when chancellor, had frozen it until 2026.

The Sunday Times has suggested a variation on the first-time buyers’ theme, including extending the government’s mortgage guarantee scheme and introducing a new kind of individual savings account (ISA) to assist potential buyers in building up a deposit.

The mortgage guarantee scheme, helping buyers to purchase with a deposit of only 5 per cent, is due to expire at the end of this year.

Housing market participants may wonder at this potential flurry of activity.

It is good that housing is getting some attention.

It would be better if politicians devoted time to long-term thinking about the sector and the kind of tax reform which would stop penalising transactions and allow the market to operate more efficiently.

That may be too much to hope for.

Source: Property Notify

83% of Homeowners Unphased by Cooling Property Values

New research from eXp UK, the platform for personal estate agents, reveals that homeowners are largely unconcerned about cooling house prices, caring more about having a home to call their own than sitting on a profitable investment.

The platform surveyed 1,094 UK homeowners to find out how they feel about cooling house prices and the impact they have on the market value of their home.

The survey reveals that, before buying their home, 89% of current homeowners believed it was important to get their foot on the housing ladder.

When asked why getting a foot on the ladder was so important, half (51%) say it was simply about being able to own a home of their own, free from landlords and rental market restrictions.

16% say they wanted to own in order to set the foundations for building a family, and just 12% say that making an investment to generate profit when later selling was their main drive for buying.

In reference to the current housing market, homeowners were asked whether they believe cooling house prices, and the subsequent return to normal levels following the extraordinary pandemic boom, are a good thing. In response, 83% say yes.

When asked whether they are worried that current cooling market conditions could snowball into a house price crash, only 27% report having any sort of concern, while 49% say they feel indifferent about the matter.

Despite today’s cooling prices, homeowners have faith in the long-term health of the UK market, with 86% saying they remain confident that when they come to sell their home, they will receive more money than they paid for it.

But even if their resale does achieve less money, owners remain, by and large, unconcerned.

86% of homeowners say that they will have no regrets if their home eventually sells for less money than they paid for it; and 72% say that, even if they had known before buying that they would lose money when reselling, it would not have prevented them from making the purchase.

Source: Property Notify

Pace of Monthly House Price Decline Slows as Market Continues to Weather the Economic Storm

UK house prices fell further in September, edging down by -0.4% on a monthly basis.

This was a sixth consecutive monthly fall, though the pace of decline slowed markedly compared to August (-1.8%).

The average home now costs £278,601, a drop of around £1,200 since last month.

On an annual basis prices are down by -4.7%, largely unchanged from -4.5% in August.

Nonetheless they remain some £39,400 higher than in March 2020, such was the extraordinary growth seen during the pandemic, said Kim Kinnaird, Director, Halifax Mortgages.

Kinnaird continued, activity levels continue to look subdued compared to recent years, with industry data showing lower levels of new instructions to sell homes and agreed sales.

Borrowing costs are the primary factor, given the impact of higher interest rates on mortgage affordability.

Against this backdrop, homeowners inevitably become more realistic about their target selling price, reflecting what has increasingly become a buyer’s market.

However, with Base Rate now likely to be at or around its peak, we are seeing fixed rate mortgages deals ease back from recent highs.

Wage growth also remains strong, which has helped with affordability, with the house price to income ratio now at its lowest level since June 2020 (6.2 in September vs 6.3 in August).

Many economists and financial markets predict that Base Rate will remain higher for longer, with any significant cuts appearing unlikely until inflation gets closer to the Bank of England’s 2% target.

Overall, these factors are likely to keep mortgage rates elevated in comparison to recent years, constraining buyer demand and putting downward pressure on house prices into next year.

House price resilience despite rate increases

The Bank of England’s decision to hold Base Rate at 5.25% at the most recent MPC meeting ended a run of 14 consecutive increases.

This was the fastest monetary policy tightening cycle in recent history.

House prices have proven more resilient than expected over that period, despite higher mortgage rates suppressing market activity.

While property prices are now around £14,000 below the August 2022 peak, they remain +1.0% above the level seen in December 2021 (£275,889), the month when Base Rate first edged up from 0.1% to 0.25%.

However, as we have highlighted previously, there is often a lag-effect between rate increases and the full impact of higher mortgage costs on house prices.

Source: Property Notify

Interest Rates Frozen for First Time in 15 Months: Have Mortgage Rates Now Peaked?

Since the Bank of England base rate started making large jumps around the middle of last year, mortgage rates have increased significantly from the historic lows that borrowers had enjoyed since early 2015, when the average two-year fixed rate dropped below 2% and the average five-year fixed went sub-3%.

By the autumn of 2021, average two-year fixed mortgages were just 1.2%, with some borrowers able to access a rate of below 1%, and average five-year fixed rates were less than 1.3%.

But in December 2021, the bank rate started to rise from its all-time low of 0.1% and mortgage interest rates followed suit, as is the norm.

Some mortgage rates spiked to over 6% following the Conservatives’ disastrous mini budget last September, although they did start to fall again once Rishi Sunak took over as leader.

By the time we entered 2023, the average two-year fixed mortgage rate was just under 5.8% and the Bank Rate stood at 3.5% with experts predicting further increases before the summer.

What’s happened to mortgage interest rates so far this year?

At the start of the year, even with the bank rate rising and inflation still high, mortgage rates continued their steady decline from the November 2022 peak.

In February, two and five-year fixed rates were 5.44% and 5.2% respectively, then in March those figures dropped to 5.32% and 5%.

But by May, as repeated base rate increases failed to have an impact on inflation, lenders began to backtrack and in mid-June, the average two-year fixed mortgage rate rose to over 6%.

Individual rates have started to come down again

However, that is just an average figure, and the good news is that individual rates have started to come down again, mainly thanks to significant falls in the rate of inflation, which is now expected to reduce to 5% by the end of this year and then reach the target of 2% by the start of 2025.

In July, HSBC became the first high street lender to announce that it was making some cuts to its fixed-rate products, with other major lenders – including Nationwide, Barclays and Virgin Money – following suit over the next month.

As it stands in September, first-time buyers can access five-year fixed rates at well under 6% and two or three-year fixed products at slightly above 6%.

Five year rates are lower than two-year rates

It’s worth noting that it’s fairly unusual for a five-year rate to be lower than a two-year one, as has been the case for around a year now.

This is the strongest possible indication that lenders do believe the base rate will fall significantly in the future.

Despite a 14th consecutive increase at the start of August, to 5.25% we have now, as of 21 September, seen the first freeze in 15 months.

Capital Economics had previously predicted that rates would peak at 5.5%, lower than previously forecast and so perhaps this will never materialised.

This is likely to be followed by continuing falls in mortgage rates, which is good news for borrowers.

Speak to a broker

There are so many variables to consider, that if you want to buy or need to remortgage this year, we think it’s well worth talking to a mortgage broker sooner rather than later, allowing at least six months to go through the remortgage process.

Mortgage applications can be held up if documents are missing, so make sure you gather what is required and provide them with all the necessary information as soon as possible.

Source: Property Notify

Some Very Welcome Rate Relief for A Resilient Housing Market

Before noon’s announcement from the Bank of England on interest rates, I was all ready to write that we should not regard a rise in official interest rates from 5.25% to 5.5% – as generally expected ahead of the decision – as bad news.

Such a rise was priced into mortgage markets, and mortgage rates had been edging down.

As everybody now knows, there was no such rise, the Bank opting to leave its rate unchanged at 5.25%, on a 5-4 vote, thus breaking a sequence which had seen 14 rate rises in a row.

This was not anticipated by the markets, even in the minutes ticking up to the announcement, so this paved the way for mortgage rates to come down even further.

It was good news.

This decision completed one of the strangest 12-month periods for official interest rates, mortgage rates and the housing market.

It is now almost exactly 12 months since Liz Truss, the very short-term prime minister, and her even shorter-term chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng, almost blew a hole in the housing market with the oddest and most irresponsible “mini” budget in modern history.

She has been defending it, though most people will remember it differently.

Two things survived from it.

The previously planned increase in National Insurance contributions for employers and employees, intended to have been renamed as the health and social care levy by now, was scrapped and has not been revived.

For the housing market there was the minor positive of a reduction in stamp duty, by raising the threshold at which it is paid (except for second homebuyers and most landlords) to £250,000, accompanied by an increase in the nil-rate band for first-time buyers from £300,000 to £425,000.

This was temporary, but quite long lasting.

The main threshold will revert to £125,000 and the first-time buyer band to £300,000 after March 31 2025, by which time we may have had a change of government.

This positive was, of course, swept away by the huge negative of surge in bond yields, a slump in sterling to a record low against the dollar, a crisis for pension funds and massive dislocation in the mortgage market, with hundreds of products withdrawn overnight, as markets feared that Bank Rate would have to rise as high as 7%.

This was the first realisation for most people that something dramatic had changed.

Years of stretched affordability when house prices were measured against earnings were compensated for by ultra-low mortgage rates.

When those mortgage rates started to rise dramatically, things changed.

Affordability was suddenly under enormous pressure.

Everybody reading this will know that housing activity and prices turned down quickly in the aftermath of that mini budget and, by and large, things have stayed down.

Prices are down by 4% to 5% on average.

Source: Property Notify

Buy-To-Let Rental Incomes have Increased by 8.7% Despite Rising Costs & Government Pressure

Landlords in England & Wales have seen their rental portfolio income increase by 8.7% in the past year.

That’s according to new research from London lettings and estate agent, Benham and Reeves, who compared the average rental portfolio income, based on portfolio size and rent values, in Q1 2022 with that in Q1 2023.

Previous research from Benham and Reeves recently reveals that throughout the nation, portfolio sizes have fallen by -5.6% year-on-year, dropping from 9.1 properties to 8.6.

However, despite smaller portfolios, the average rent value has increased by 15.1%, rising from £7,396 in Q1 2022 to £8,510 in Q1 2023.

As such, the average landlord’s annual portfolio income has increased from £67,304 to £73,186 over the same time period, an increase of £5,882 or 8.7%.

On a regional level, the biggest income increase has been seen in London. The average portfolio size in the capital has shown the slightest of declines from 7.6 properties to 7.5, but the average rental income per property has soared by 34.7% to £13,095.

This means that the annual rental income generated from the average buy-to-let portfolio within the capital has increased by 32.9% and now sits at £98,213.

Despite falling rent values leading to a -7.7% decrease in the income per property, landlords in the East of England have enjoyed a strong portfolio income increase of 32.7%.

This is due to a huge increase in portfolio size, rising 6.4 properties to 9.2 in the past year.

Portfolio income has also increased in the South East (27.8%), Yorkshire & Humber (16.4%), the South West (15.5%), North West (5.5%), and North East (0.6%).

In three regions, however, landlords have seen their portfolio income decrease over the past year.

Wales has seen the most significant decrease of -19.2%.

This comes despite the average rental income per property seeing the biggest increase of all regions (41.5%), and is therefore being driven by the average portfolio size falling from 12.6 properties to 7.2.

The East Midlands has seen portfolio income fall by -11.1%, once again driven by a shrinking average portfolio size, down from 11.8 in 2022 to 7.8 in 2023.

The West Midlands has seen portfolios increase from 8.5 to 9.2, but a drop of -8.7% in income per property means that portfolio income has fallen by -1.2%.

Source: Property Notify

Average UK Rental Prices Continue to Rise Across All Regions

New data from HomeLet has revealed that average UK rental prices have continued to rise across all regions, with the average rent, excluding London, now £1,051 per month (PCM), up 1.4%, while prices in the capital have continued to soar to a new high of £2,145 PCM, up 1.7%.

The continued rise in rental prices comes at a time when there has been a record increase in mortgage interest rates.

The current average five-year rate is now 6.19%, compared to 2.64% in December 2021, and as a result, many first-time buyers are unable to buy a home.

This also comes at a time when 1.6 million Brits will be coming to an end of their fixed-rate mortgages at the end of the year, with many unable to afford to remortgage – piling pressure on a dwindling rental market and pushing up rental prices, as demand outstrips supply.

The rental market has seen an exodus of landlords at a time when properties are in huge demand.

However, despite the demand, it has become less profitable for buy-to-let landlords to rent out a property.

This comes as soaring mortgage prices are now forcing landlords to push up rental costs to cover their mortgage repayments, alongside the planned introduction of the government’s costly new EPC targets, which will force landlords to upgrade the energy efficiency of their buy-to-let properties to a rating of ‘C’ within 5 years.

This is set to come at a considerable cost or Landlords willface fines of up to £30,000.

Data from Cornerstone Tax 2020 found that only 20% of landlords in the UK now say their investment has been a successful one.

Source: Property Notify

ESTATE AGENTS ALDENHAMESTATE AGENTS BUSHEYESTATE AGENTS LETCHMORE HEATHESTATE AGENTS OXHEY HALLESTATE AGENTS OXHEY VILLAGEESTATE AGENTS RADLETTESTATE AGENTS WATFORD

ESTATE AGENTS HERTFORDSHIREESTATE AGENTS HERTFORDSHIRE